From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1964 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Continental Can Co. Full case name United States v. Continental Can Co., et al. Citations 378 U.S. 441 (more Prior Motion to dismiss granted, 217 F. Supp. 761 (S.D.N.Y. 1963) Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits a corporation from acquiring another company when it results in a substantial reduction in competition, applies to competition between different industries for the same end user market. Southern District of New York reversed and remanded.
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart Byron White · Arthur Goldberg
Majority White, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg Concurrence Goldberg Dissent Harlan, joined by Stewart 15 U.S.C. § 18 (Clayton Act § 7)
United States v. Continental Can Co. U.S. Supreme Court case which addressed antitrust issues. One issue it addressed was how should a market segment be defined for purposes of reviewing a merger of companies which manufacture different but related products.
In 1956, Continental Can Company , the second largest producer of metal containers in the U.S., acquired the Hazel-Atlas Glass Company , the third largest producer of glass containers.
The government sought Continental Can's divestiture of the assets of Hazel-Atlas, arguing that the merger was a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act . The government claimed ten product markets existed, including the can industry, the glass container industry, and various lines of commerce defined by the end use of the containers.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found three product markets: metal containers, glass containers, and beer containers. The district court dismissed the case, holding that the government had failed to prove reasonable probability of lessening competition in the markets it had identified.
This section
needs expansion . You can help by
adding to it .
(April 2013 )
Statutes and Supreme Court
Sherman Antitrust Act
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States Northern Securities Co. v. United States Swift & Co. v. United States Loewe v. Lawlor Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States United States v. American Tobacco Co. United States v. Terminal Railroad Association Chicago Board of Trade v. United States United States v. Colgate & Co. Federal Baseball Club v. National League United States v. General Electric Co. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC United States v. Masonite Corp. United States v. Univis Lens Co. Parker v. Brown United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n Associated Press v. United States Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. International Salt Co. v. United States United States v. Line Material Co. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. United States v. United States Gypsum Co. Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States Lorain Journal Co. v. United States United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. Radovich v. National Football League Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. United States v. Loew's Inc. United States v. Wise Silver v. New York Stock Exchange United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Albrecht v. Herald Co. Haywood v. National Basketball Association Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. Flood v. Kuhn Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society Rice v. Norman Williams Co. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan State Oil Co. v. Khan Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. Texaco Inc. v. Dagher Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC Ohio v. American Express Co. National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston Interstate Commerce Act Clayton Antitrust Act FTC Act case lawRobinson–Patman Act Other cases
Other federal Ongoing Related topics ‡ date of filing
![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small}
Works related to United States v. Continental Can Co. at Wikisource
